返回上一页 文章阅读 登录

张力:走向共识:美国协商行政立法的兴起与发展

更新时间:2013-06-04 20:09:38
作者: 张力  

   18 Environmental Law 55, p. 89-90 (1987).

  [2]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 33 (2000).

  [3]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 9.

  [4]Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Administrative Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Development of Negotiated Rulemaking and Other Processes, 14 Pepperdine Law Review 863, p. 870 (1987).

  [5]Richard B. Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harvard Law Review 1667, p. 1789-1790(1975).

  [6]John T. Dunlop, The Limits of Legal Compulsion, 27 Labor Law Journal 67, p. 72 (1976).

  [7]Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Administrative Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Development of Negotiated Rulemaking and Other Processes, 14 Pepperdine Law Review 863, p. 872-873 (1987).

  [8]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 53 (2000).

  [9]Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Negotiated Rulemaking in Practice, 5 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 482, p. 483 (1986).

  [10]Philip J. Harter, Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise, 71 The Georgetown Law Journal 1, p. 18-19 (1982).

  [11]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 2-3.

  [12]Philip J. Harter, Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise, 71 The Georgetown Law Journal 1, p. 28 (1982).

  [13]William F. Funk, Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Charles Pon. Jr., eds., Federal Administrative Procedure Sourcebook (Fourth Edition), American Bar Association, 2008, p. 941.

  [14]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 36-37 (2000).

  [15]Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Achieving Policymaking Consensus: The (Unfortunate) Waning of negotiated Rulemaking, 49 South Texas Law Review 987, p. 1007-1017 (2008).

  [16]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 9-10.

  [17]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 35 (2000).

  [18]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 126.

  [19]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 35 (2000).

  [20]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 129-130.

  [21]5 U. S. C.§562 (2).

  [22]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 214-215.

  [23]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 230.

  [24]Lawrence Susskind, Gerard McMahon, The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking, 3 Yale Journal on Regulation 133, p. 161 (1985).

  [25]Lawrence Susskind, Gerard McMahon, The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking, 3 Yale Journal on Regulation 133, p. 138-140 (1985).

  [26]Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Achieving Policymaking Consensus: The (Unfortunate) Waning of negotiated Rulemaking, 49 South Texas Law Review 987, p. 996-1005 (2008).

  [27]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 369-372.

  [28]Ronald M. Levin, Rulemaking under the 2010 Model State Administrative Procedure Act, 20 Windener Law Journal855, p. 867 (2011).

  [29]Little Hoover Commission, Better Regulation: Improving California' s Rulemaking Process, 2011, p. 16.


爱思想关键词小程序
本文责编:frank
发信站:爱思想(http://m.aisixiang.com)
本文链接:http://m.aisixiang.com/data/64518.html
文章来源:《行政法学研究》2012年第4期
收藏