18 Environmental Law 55, p. 89-90 （1987）.

　　[2]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 33 （2000）.

　　[3]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 9.

　　[4]Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Administrative Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Development of Negotiated Rulemaking and Other Processes, 14 Pepperdine Law Review 863, p. 870 （1987）.

　　[5]Richard B. Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harvard Law Review 1667, p. 1789-1790（1975）.

　　[6]John T. Dunlop, The Limits of Legal Compulsion, 27 Labor Law Journal 67, p. 72 （1976）.

　　[7]Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Administrative Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Development of Negotiated Rulemaking and Other Processes, 14 Pepperdine Law Review 863, p. 872-873 （1987）.

　　[8]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 53 （2000）.

　　[9]Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Negotiated Rulemaking in Practice, 5 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 482, p. 483 （1986）.

　　[10]Philip J. Harter, Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise, 71 The Georgetown Law Journal 1, p. 18-19 （1982）.

　　[11]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 2-3.

　　[12]Philip J. Harter, Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise, 71 The Georgetown Law Journal 1, p. 28 （1982）.

　　[13]William F. Funk, Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Charles Pon. Jr., eds., Federal Administrative Procedure Sourcebook （Fourth Edition）, American Bar Association, 2008, p. 941.

　　[14]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 36-37 （2000）.

　　[15]Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Achieving Policymaking Consensus: The （Unfortunate） Waning of negotiated Rulemaking, 49 South Texas Law Review 987, p. 1007-1017 （2008）.

　　[16]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 9-10.

　　[17]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 35 （2000）.

　　[18]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 126.

　　[19]Philip J. Harter, Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 9 New York University Environmental Law Journal 32, p. 35 （2000）.

　　[20]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 129-130.

　　[21]5 U. S. C.§562 （2）.

　　[22]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 214-215.

　　[23]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 230.

　　[24]Lawrence Susskind, Gerard McMahon, The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking, 3 Yale Journal on Regulation 133, p. 161 （1985）.

　　[25]Lawrence Susskind, Gerard McMahon, The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking, 3 Yale Journal on Regulation 133, p. 138-140 （1985）.

　　[26]Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Achieving Policymaking Consensus: The （Unfortunate） Waning of negotiated Rulemaking, 49 South Texas Law Review 987, p. 996-1005 （2008）.

　　[27]Administrative Conference of the United States, Negotiated Rulemaking Sourcebook, 1995, p. 369-372.

　　[28]Ronald M. Levin, Rulemaking under the 2010 Model State Administrative Procedure Act, 20 Windener Law Journal855, p. 867 （2011）.

　　[29]Little Hoover Commission, Better Regulation: Improving California' s Rulemaking Process, 2011, p. 16.